Note: This will be an odd post. Not because I have evidence to support all the ideas and concepts inside. I am also not a legal expert. Rather, I am delving into a plausible ROOT CAUSE that no NORMIE would ever entertain, because its too mindboggling complex, but also, highly simple to relate to overall.
The silly arrogance of peasants when they think they know how the world actually works.
[ALL CAPS is NOT YELLING. IT IS FOR IMPORTANCE. TAKE HEED READERS.]
Ultimately, we are all slaves of something. We are mere mortals living a finite experience that we term as a human being. But what if, your birth is merely to be considered a corporate entity – to bought and sold like chattel – through a myriad of legal agreements made by admiralty law firms that operate for royalty (oligarchs) the world over and unbeknownst to you.
This is not a new concept. I had been made aware of the corporation concept of the United States many moons ago, but didn’t investigate (and where does one begin on that?) it too deeply. The bigger question – and this is where I depart (almost immediately from the above video that one should watch completely before reading my thoughts – so stop, and watch it, right now please) is exactly when, where, how did we become corporately enslaved?
And also: how do we undo this corporate slavery the United States (and the world cultures who think they are remotely sovereign, but are not in the least) we are under completely, if I am right. (AM I RIGHT?)
When. The Root Cause Analysis for how things get going must tie (in one’s opinion) back to British Contract Law, the LAW OF THE SEAS, and the cessation of war that occurred in 1781. We should be fairly aware that Contract Law was not the invention of the American Colonies. It was an import from their chartering country: THE BRITISH EMPIRE RULED by a KING. Our States Names are in close referencing to these: MARY – LAND or NEW - YORK.
I am not a lawyer, but ADMIRALTY LAW would seem a very particular and precise and quite possibly, the only LAW that MATTERS with regards to your actual BEING and its SCOPE of OPERATIONS on the EARTH. One is familiar with courts, in general, and their role: the handling certain types of disputes, limited in scope, based off the parties to the case (having jurisdiction ON THEIR PERSONAGE), the venue for courts decisions being applicable and enforceable, and the dispute being legally decidable under that court’s defined powers over the parties before it. Then, these decisions made by a JUDGE are appealable, to another court that was designated to be the proper procedural venue to make these appeals. Yet, in all of this – what is REALLY, AT BAR?
What if all disputes are merely an ADMIRALTY LAW complaint between two or more thoroughly ENSLAVED CORPORATIONS called Human Beings? Did the U.S. Constitution confer anything at all onto the body of persons called: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?
WHEN we CALL the US CONSTITUTION the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND does that FAIL to ACKNOWLEDGE: THE SEAS?
What does anyone know PRECISELY about the EVERY agreement made by THE FOUNDERS of the UNITED STATES?
Do we know if THE BRITISH MONARCHY actually ceded both the lands and seas “and freedom” to us ALL?
And for how long was that BARGAIN STRUCK?
Were there other stipulations THAT WE are not PRIVY to, thus IGNORANT of the CONTRACT, and THE LAW?
Who. Another person I noticed talking about these complex things, in broad and detailed strokes, is CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS.
She mentioned the concept of perfecting COLLATERAL with respect to SLAVES. The most profitable business in the world is to own a person’s toil and keep them alive to carry out the tasking of their MASTERS.
This is not unknown to anyone. People cry about REPARATIONS as CORPORATIONS (if the VIDEO ABOVE has much credence) from WHOM? The UNITED STATES CORPORATION?
Crying about REPARATIONS is just stating aloud: I AM ENSLAVED.
WHO owns the UNITED STATES? (If you buy the premise so far.)
A few more thoughts, that echo something is largely amiss or overlooked.
The CHINESE (the ENTITY operated by the CHINESE COMMUNIST CORPORATION) declared all the WATERS surrounding them (all the way across the PACIFIC) and all the SKY ABOVE THEM are THEIRS. That’s pretty significant don’t you think?
(Page 13 in Zbigniew Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard) To quote from his book:
China -- the Celestial Empire -- was seen as the center of the universe, with only barbarians on its peripheries and beyond. To be Chinese meant to be cultured, and for that reason, the rest of the world owed China its due deference. That special sense of superiority permeated the response given by the Chinese emperor -- even in the phase of China's growing decline, in the late eighteenth century -- to King George III of Great Britain, whose emissaries had attempted to inveigle China into a trading relationship by offering some British industrial products as goodwill gifts:
We, by the Grace of Heaven, Emperor, instruct the King of England to take note of our charge: The Celestial Empire, ruling all within the four seas . . . does not value rare and precious things . . . nor do we have the slightest need of your country's manufactures. . . . Hence we . . . have commanded your tribute envoys to return safely home. You, O King, should simply act in conformity with our wishes by strengthening your loyalty and swearing perpetual obedience.
Such arrogance does not dissipate with decline, rather: it GROWS.
One of the CHINESE’S biggest BEEFS lay with the BRITISH EMPIRE – and the EAST INDIA TRADING CORPORATION, that injected OPIUM into their QING DYNASTY to its DEMISE in the early 20th Century (1912).
The BRITISH EMPIRE did not bail out the Royals in the Russian Empire, the ROMANOVS. Those royals were quickly replaced with COMMUNISTS – or were they (totally)?
The Destruction of GERMANY in 1945 is now operated by radical GREENS/SOCIALISTS.
The ongoing desire of the “UNITED KINGDOM” that has no army or ships to carry out their threats (well, aside from the UNITED STATES) is to attack RUSSIA to remove PUTIN. Russia too still has “industrial oligarchs” that may be just operating at the behest of the UK.
LASTLY, the UNITED STATES is under a COMMUNIST TAKEOVER. Our RIGHTS are being destructed, and it is fairly represented in the video that LOYALTY OATHS to the US CONSTITUTION are NOT ENFORCEABLE.
So, ASK YOURSELF:
ARE WE facing this because a TERMINAL DATE to a LONG AGO CONTRACT was REACHED?
KING CHARLES (the woe-is-me clown at the “oligarchic helm” of the UK) is highly INVOLVED with the GREAT RESET.
So, WHAT IS THE GREAT RESET?
KLAUS’S MESSAGE: YOU WILL OWN NOTHING…
YOU WILL BE OWNED AGAIN.
YOU WILL BE INCORPORATED BACK UNDER ADMIRALTY LAW.
THE BRITISH-SINO EMPIRE WILL ARISE?
WHOEVER holds the CONTRACT to your person – OWNS YOU BY LAW.
(Oligarchs have no faith but to their own omnipotence.)
Your ignorance is irrelevant to these sorts of people.
You were SIGNED over by some mechanism from the very day you were born.
BUT, to perfect COLLATERAL, the need to TAG & MARK (but of course do it CONVENIENTLY so as to arouse your suspicions) will be the final agenda…..
NOTICE the NAZIS were great at keeping records and placing numbers on their captured bodies.
One suggests this too was just an iteration of the same goal by the same powers through the latest technological methods – but it failed to do so. Maybe at the highest levels, one or two oligarchs thought better of it – and eased off the gas pedal for another plan. (IT HELPED that HITLER was a MILITARY BUFFOON. But the MONETARY SYSTEM – that is now about to fail – was INSTALLED instead.)
Moreover, the POWERS THAT OWN do not want a complete COLLATERAL-ERASING WAR. But they do want a WAR to trim off the fat of the population – The USELESS EATERS as we are termed – and THANOS ahead to the NEW AGE of TRANSHUMAN COLLATERALIZED TECHNO-MANAGEMENT.
Scary times and scary thoughts if one begins to expand the chess game across not just a few decades but hundreds of years and across the SEA of LAWS, CONTRACTS and HUMAN SLAVE CORPORATIONS.
As much as I wish to read this as I read many of your pieces, this one is simply too unreadable for me. Too many all caps in it to follow. Too distracting for me to push through. I gave up a few paragraphs in. It's a shame. I know there's more in it that would resonate with me. But I'm not up to forcing my eyes to push through that much distracting clutter. I wish you had laid off the upper cases so I could read it. Maybe with edits I'd be tempted to return to it. Hope you don't take it personal or be defensive about it, just sharing my truth of it.