I am endeavoring to consolidate in two volumes the last three years and well a century trek to this moment in time. The prior editions are always flawed - one can’t see history through a firehose - so as not miss and overlook parts of the cohesive plot (conspiracy) to do things hitherto unbelievable to an ordinary person.
I will be posting rarely, if at all, in the next month. Need to focus all my energies on this major revamp which will be be in both digital and paper back editions. So yes, it takes time to do such things. [Please download for you records.]
Here is the Amazon uploaded July 2022 update, topping 846 pages. The new edition will be much cleaner with hopefully a narrative that one can follow easier - it is a sprawling work, it is a history document, not a summary. The prior editions were often about gathering intelligence, dropping into roughly the sections as it best fit. It was a bit of a mess. But so was all the agendas driving it.
There are many more than I can consolidate together in real time. ONE HEALTH is one of them that I will mention, but will not dive into deeply. Brian O’Shea, along with others, are your point people for fighting that HEALTH & HYGIENE ONE WORLD AGENDA driven by the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. (Echoes of what will be discussed below.)
Here is a preview of a narrative style in this final revamp. See you July 4th!
Chapter 1: One World Order Agenda
“We know where we want to end up: success. We want to matter. Wealth and recognition and reputation are nice too. We want it all…This is the thinking that creates the Faustian bargain that turns most clean ambition into shameless addiction…because no one ever said, reflecting on the whole of someone’s life, ‘Man, the monstrous ego was worth it.’” – Ego Is the Enemy, Ryan Holiday
The Great Reset is about the controlled collapse of post-World War II monetary, political and social systems and their replacement with Totalitarian systems, with similarities but for their geographic operating centers, and from which they will be no conceivable escape by the local populations. The financial aspects of the prior Bretton Woods-driven World Order are cracking from enormous debt loads worldwide, at over $320 trillion, derivatives estimated over $1.5 quadrillion (notional estimate), and long-term liabilities incalculable across all 194 countries, but hazard they are on the magnitude of a quadrillion plus.
The political fractures – the cold war ending – first took place in 1991, as the Berlin Wall fell. The Great Game 2.0 launched, thereafter, but with a new wrinkle: China rising off the backs of Americans too busy to notice, too propagandized to admonish their corrupted political class (or cheated at the ballot box), and too distracted by technology, from the internet to iPhones. Geopolitics took a backburner to Google and Grinder.
The social realities are the most jarring, if one believes in meritocracy, minimizing internal strife, and operating from classic Western moorings tied to a God, a family, and fair treatment and respect of traditions laid since the Magna Carta and through to the U.S. Constitution. The “hypocrisy class,” that is Washington, D.C., has made war its sole overarching agenda, guided by their elder British cousin’s antipathies while preaching “democracy” and a “rules-based order” is its overarching foreign policy goal. But such traditions and policies are destined for death as failed promises aplenty are made by these agenda operators in the next World Order forming quickly before our eyes. There are many faces to this, thousands actually, that have been trained, conditioned, and bred to rule over the Masses. They see Humanity much as the ancients did: pliable and useful slaves that must be completely controlled.
~
The birthing of such an agenda rarely begins in a glitzy conference room or a Swiss Alps retreat. Rather, it begins in a school, or a factory, or a bar, or a dormitory, or even a graduate course taught by an awe-inspiring lecturer that produces that final trigger of inspiration. The student soaks in all the personal thoughts of his university mentor, his Plato, that goes along with a host of preconceived notions and upbringing that has excited the mind to think of global possibilities: that with just the right amount of effort, manipulation, and congealing of acolytes into an organization to carry out the deeper, more penetrating task for the invisible hands, that ultimately finance this collective control aspiration, that no one person can ever stop – not even a U.S. President.
This might be a fitting description of what Klaus Schwab is or became after attending lectures hosted by his mentor, Henry Kissinger, at Harvard.[i] Schwab’s growth thereafter from merely a professional engineer to the leader of the European Economic Forum might be seen as a substantial achievement. But for one that saw his mentor rise to U.S. Secretary of State in the Nixon administration, and go to China immediately after ping-pong diplomacy[ii], the desire to exceed the master likely grew, happily.
With Kissinger’s trek, the mission was to sway Mao permanently away from the orbit of USSR with democratizing and globalizing Capitalism. As this was later initiated, upon new leadership in both the United States and China, Schwab’s own ambitions must have been stoked even further from the observance of his Plato’s ascension into the pantheon of geopolitical history. The intervening years since China opened to the West (with zero democracy changes) shows Klaus inviting Kissinger to his World Economic Forum (WEF) and recounting a similar origin story starting from Klaus’s Harvard interactions with Kissinger.
As a student of history and engineering, Klaus also more than knew about the potentiality of rising from obscurity to the leadership of an energetic group of people. Klaus’s birth in Ravensburg, Germany was just fifteen years after Adolf Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch; and like Hitler, Klaus’s origin story included less German, with more Swiss and Austrian touches, but never let a confusing starting point deter from one’s deeply-held desires. For Hitler, it was fanatical nationalistic reunification of Germany and Austria (sans the ethnic populace) and revenge against Jews and others Hitler deemed unworthy; for Klaus, it is fanatical global public-private partnerships, Fascism, at a scale hitherto unachieved, and humanity’s transitioning, after its downsizing through a war-like, Maoist identity politics attrition, towards a Klausian dream of Transhumanism. Klaus’s World Economic Forum promoted, slickly, no property ownership: an absolute Communist tenet as well.[iii]
Unlike Hitler, Klaus learned violent pushes, the old types of war, are little tolerated in a hypermedia environment, both as he likely experienced by the 1970s; and later, Klaus deployed the media, more properly, to gather those corporate allies. Growing up in Cold War Europe, radicalism was heavily highlighted in media whenever it included any of the Nazi tenets. Klaus, and his future World Economic Forum, instead worked at talent development in media, presentation, narrative building, and catastrophizing of any global issue to a workable end for power attainment. The workable end – more control through his forum – came through more asymmetric warfare-like techniques. Or as James Lindsay pointed well to, “a middle-level violence,” that make it difficult to respond to without losing moral authority.[iv]
Instead of excited rhetoric that blamed Jews for all of the Germany’s ills, or persuasive propaganda that spoke of the great Germany Adolf could, or would achieve, with expansive totalitarian powers, Klaus’s talks in grand narratives about a transhumanistic and a fully equitable world if given the proper collaborations between multinational corporations (MNC) and institutions inside of state governments that can achieve more than any leader of any nation ever will again.
But sovereignty is to be abolished on a national level with this. Thus, nationalism is demonized; culture atomized and monolithic to the whimsies of the rich and powerful; personal boundaries and thoughts sanitized by information agents (IA). All to build towards a singular sovereign of the World, a (UN-WEF-CCP) collaboration that will reach down to the local populations through controlled bodies (NGOs, Foundations, Think Tanks, and Military). These will use AI, drones, internet technology, and surveillance, still developing, and growing more intrusive and pernicious daily.
It is not that the end objective is any different from Hitler’s; just the approach to it is a much more, so-called, enlightened dictatorial imperative, done with softer persuasion techniques, towards a Utopian Technocracy arising at the end of these Fascist financial partnerships. Klaus’s World Economic Forum forges these from a Davos, Switzerland ski-sloped, winter retreat. Economics, not bombs, do the needed damage, both direct, and collateral, to those that do not agree with this top-down subversion of humanity towards total automation, identity and resource control.
In many respects, this pulls too from the Chinese Communist gameplan for all humanity, but particularly for: the United States.[v] Subvert and destroy freedoms, particularly religion, speech, arms, and due process, and label quickly anyone that protests against this. By catastrophe and coercion, the goal is to create a compelling fiction that U.S. is solely bad guy.
(This is but half right: D.C. governmental agencies have accrued a level of mendacious and malevolence to be rightly responsible for problems worldwide. Except, these folks never do anything without various players, China, paralleling the same destructive and entrapping actions. The two largest economies have such thuggery down to “a science.”
The peoples of both countries are subverted and subservient to their governments. In China, there is 1.3 billion peasants with a ruling class of 5,000 senior CCP members and 96 million reporting Party members. In the U.S., there is approximately 130 million working class laborers with a government class of 21 million reporting to their top political, agency, and Wall Street class personnel that align with the CCP on most things.
If only these peoples were willing to sacrifice for the future of Humanity and break the onerous shackles of mind, of body, and of spirit.)
~
A notable parallel here, Hitler’s nine month stay in prison was in excellent accommodations to dictate his Mein Kampf drivel, as Shirer noted:
“Such were the ideas of Adolf Hitler, set down in all their appalling crudeness as he sat in Landsberg prison gazing out at a flowering orchard above the River Lech, or later, in 1925-26, as he reclined on the balcony of a comfortable inn at Berchtesgaden and looked out across the towering Alps toward his native Austria…he would build on the shoddy foundations we have seen, and which he would rule with an iron hand. That one day he would build it and rule it he had no doubts whatsoever, for he was possessed of that burning sense…
A crude Darwinism? A sadistic fancy? An irresponsible egoism? A megalomania? It was all of these in part. But it was something more (90).”[vi]
Adolf, according to Shirer’s great work, noted three things worked in politics for the German Social Democrats: create a mass movement; the art of propaganda; the art of “spiritual and physical terror (Shirer, 22).”[vii] Shirer focused on the last one as the faulty analysis derived from the racist prejudices of Hitler that spilled forth from Mein Kampf.
This three-pronged political observation came about in the early 1910s. This likely developed from the psychological mastery (such as it was then) in the hacking of the human mind’s id, ego and superego. Sigmund Freud, a Vienna-based practitioner, could of theoretically ran across a young, “bohemian” Adolf as he too was in Vienna (Shirer, 19-21). Freud was then at the beating heart of the burgeoning psychiatric profession.[viii]
Meanwhile, Sigmund’s nephew provided the consumeristic pulse of media propaganda in the United States. Edward Bernays, worked for Wilson’s War Department[ix]; attended the Versailles Peace Conference; wrote the book, Propaganda (1928); and was very popular with Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda for the 3rd Reich. Later, Bernays did more off-the-books work for the newly-formed CIA.
Bernays wrote in Propaganda: “Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government,”[x],[xi] ; and this more pronounced and directed result of Bernays thinking, paraphrasing from The Century of the Self (2000): “If Propaganda can be used for war, it can be used for peace (8:00).”[xii], [xiii]
Such provided the background grist for which Hitler, if he was even aware of Bernays or Freud in the 1910s, could hack about in his later incoherent rhetoric and long-winded musings. Certainly, Paul Joseph Goebbels had post-hoc conversations that reinforced what Hitler thought and described in Mein Kampf after Goebbels came fully into the Nazi fold, as its main messaging component, by mid-1926 (Shirer, 123).[xiv]
Goebbels was intellectually trained in ways that should have been off-putting to the coarse and scatterbrained future Nazi leader in Adolf. However, this was not the case. Nor was Goebbels instantly lovestruck with Nazism. But during the 1925-26 timeframe, that gradually turned around and later cemented into place for the duration of Joseph’s life.
In Shirer’s words, “The diary of Goebbels is full of expressions of sympathy for Communism at this time (126).”[xv] And, “on January 31, 1926, he told himself in his diary: “I think it is terrible that we [the Nazis] and the Communists are bashing in each other’s heads…” Goebbels would attempt détente with the communists in an open letter penned in this timeframe along with attacks on the “nobles” possession of German wealth. Meanwhile, Hitler’s Party was financed greatly by those very nobles, or their industries, that Goebbels proposed to nationalize (126-27).[xvi] Nevertheless, by that early spring, after various confabs with the ever-persistent and long-winded Hitler, Dr. Goebbels, was wooed to the cloth of Nazism, in perpetuity, happily or not (128-29).[xvii]
~
With the terrorizing of the mind and body affirmed into the Nazi playbook, Hitler was particularly interested in taking down the bourgeoisie through lies and slander, even as he exploited them financially for his own benefit almost from the outset of the party’s formation; and using the mass movement point above to physically terrorize any would-be opponents, particularly the communists.
His would-be obsessive and ideologically adjacent offspring, Klaus, certainly uses emotion with a harsh accent that has little warmth and focuses on terrorizing by the use of climate change promotion towards his Great Reset. Klaus’s WEF organization promotes an unhealthy control of media narratives and never gives any avenue for questions of his non-governmental role, except by the adoring and well-coached journalistic supporters, particularly originating from CGTN in China.
An overlay of Maoist principles, identity politics, additionally spring to the fore, when the WEF routinely call for “equity” while censoring people that do not agree with one’s agenda. During the cultural revolution, under the last days of Mao (1966-1976), categorizing people as “red” or “black”, with five identities each, created the pot for millions to be publicly humiliated and killed as well. The “blacks identities” were the oppressors, and targeted by the “reds” in this cultural revolution.[xviii],[xix] These are[xx]:
Landlords (dìzhǔ)
Rich farmers (fùnóng)
Counter-revolutionaries (fǎngémìng)
Bad influencers (huàifènzǐ)
Right-wingers (yòupài)
As one set of quotes further this unified thesis, had from a July 2020 Building Back Better document on Media, Entertainment and Culture Industry, this paper posed that controlling messaging through demonetization, emotion, and using the Pandemic to install equity is needed as the response from this absolutely crucial industry to control:
“We examined the demonetization of harmful content through initiatives such as the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), in partnership with the Forum’s ‘Shaping the Future of Media, Entertainment and Culture’ platform… (3)
Responsible leadership is a critical enabler of sustainable governance. Top leaders exhibit five elements of responsible leadership: 1) stakeholder inclusion; 2) emotion and intuition; 3) mission and purpose; 4) technology and innovation; and 5) intellect and insight… (4)
The pandemic precipitated ‘three years of transformation in three months’. It presented both an imperative to respond and an opportunity to change, to build back better. It provided an opportunity to revisit long-held assumptions, to rebuild, redesign and reprioritize to create a more trusted, prosperous, resilient and equitable industry (5).”[xxi]
One should look askance at this unaccountable world body designing up a censorship environment; based on emotion as a key pillar in leadership; and slickly offering transformation that references equitable (in the eyes of which beholder?), that will not be by any transparent process. Rather, it is decided by its worthiness (by a WEF selection) to be an installed leader, a controlled technocrat. And more worrisome: abuses out of such a selection system supporting WEF-appropriate narratives, emotions and equity-defined processes are unquestioned, much like all dictatorships operate. Such Maoism, with Fascistic characteristics, introduced the world to Klaus Schwab’s WEF messaging, full-on. The public-private authoritarian regime of China is lauded as well as the ideal model to mimic. (And many Globalists parrot that line of thinking from Thomas Friedman to Justin Trudeau through to Joe Biden.)
For many years, the WEF Young Leaders were prepped, penetrating positions of power in nation-states and some 450 cities worldwide.[xxii] The UN as well partnered with the WEF in the summer of 2019 to move along their Agenda 2030.[xxiii] Such infiltration to steer ALL policy, at a whim, when the time was ripe. That ripening time came in 2020, as the book: COVID-19: The Great Reset, was released not unlike the virus itself. This to introduce all to the wonderful world the Global Parasitic Elites want for themselves with a few billion slaves or serfs under their thumb permanently.
More importantly, the number of corporations ranging across all sectors of industry (automotive, banking, electronics, health & pharma, to social media), countries (China, Saudi Arabia, United States, et.al) and cities and leaderships should be cause for alarm. As of 2023, this alarm is more clearly the case. Above gives scope and a few faces of this WEF Agenda.
From the WEF Global Shapers 2020-21 Annual Report:
“In August 2020, 2,500 inspiring young leaders participated in the first-ever virtual Global Shapers Annual Summit to inspire, support and scale collective action. Members enrolled in a five-day programme featuring plenary sessions with leading experts including Al Gore, Ellyn Shook, Yo-Yo Ma and Lindiwe Mazibuko, along with community activities to build relationships and workshops to share best practices and plan projects.”[i] [My emphasis.]
~
Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch happened on November 8, 1923. Now nearly a century ago. Hitler fired a pistol during that failed coup night, a false start that led to his incarceration and publication of his prison scribblings in Mein Kampf (My Struggle). The atmosphere that gave him even the remotest inkling of a chance to start this revolution lay in the five years prior.
On November 11, 1918, Germany formally surrendered and soon faced the onerous, if seemingly warranted, Versailles Treaty dictates. It was only a short while before those dictates – financial reparations in hard collateral, gold marks (Shirer, 58), and restrictions on any militarization – both hamstrung the economy and wounded the German pride of the military warriors that came home defeated, and betrayed, in their views. (Some have offered that Germany never fulfilled any of those reparations. But even the perception that they did had its economic impacts, hyperinflation as we will see.)
The Weimar Republic was a disastrous failure and extremism grows from government corruption, weakness, and ineptitude in handling the peoples’ rights and economic concerns. Weimar had this from its start. Versailles was the main focus of the Germans; Shirer reminded that:
“German memories did not appear to stretch back as far as one year, to March 3, 1918, when the victorious German Supreme Command had imposed on a defeated Russia at Brest Litovsk a peace treaty…[that] deprived Russia of a territory nearly as large as Austria-Hungary and Turkey combined, with 56,000,000 inhabitants…a third of her railway mileage, 73 percent of her iron ore, 89 percent of her total coal production…moreover, Russia was obliged to pay Germany an indemnity of six billion marks (57).”[ii]
The Weimar Republic that agreed to Versailles soon violated the military side of the agreement while also meting out justice unevenly from Shirer’s recounting of treason charges aimed at political adversaries on the Left that fueled Hitler’s ambitions knowing consequences were minimal for extreme attempts (Shirer, 60).[iii]
Likewise, the German mark fell like a stone over the course of 1921-1923. From 75 to a U.S. dollar in 1921, to 400 in 1922, it started 1923 at 7,000. This currency collapse paired with the French occupation of Germany’s Ruhr, their industrial epicenter, and home to most of Germany’s coal production. Non-violent strikes were supported by the Berlin government; others however went the sabotage route with other methods that the France decided were unacceptable, and countered with a range of options from arrests to death sentences. More spectacularly, the freefall of the currency to 4,000,000,000 marks to the dollar by November 1923 was the defining backdrop on which Hitler saw as a German crisis becoming his golden opportunity (Shirer, 61).[i]
Adolf’s opportunity was nixed barely out of the womb, failing in a night. However, a more familiar group benefited handsomely as Shirer reflects:
“The inflation could have been halted by merely balancing the budget – a difficult but not an impossible feat. Adequate taxation might have achieved this…Instead of drastically raising taxes on those who could pay, the republican government actually reduced them in 1921.
From then on, goaded by the big industrialists and landlords, who stood to gain though the masses of the people were financially ruined, the government deliberately let the mark tumble in order to free the State of its public debts, to escape from paying reparations…Moreover, the destruction of currency enabled German heavy industry to wipe out its indebtedness by refunding its obligations in worthless marks…
The masses of the people, however, did not realize how much the industrial tycoons, the Army and the State were benefiting from the ruin of the currency (Shirer, 61-62).”[ii]
…….. sample end.
References
[ii] https://www.amazon.com/Ping-Pong-Diplomacy-Secret-History-Changed/dp/1634505565
[iii] https://www.forbes.com/sites/worldeconomicforum/2016/11/10/shopping-i-cant-really-remember-what-that-is-or-how-differently-well-live-in-2030 Archive: https://archive.ph/V06y4
[iv] https://rumble.com/v2os8hg-james-lindsay-wokism-is-maoism-with-american-characteristics.html
[v] https://web.archive.org/web/20200716013009/https:/cyberdefensereview.army.mil/Portals/6/Documents/CDR%20Journal%20Articles/The%20Secret%20War%20Against%20the%20United%20States_Fleming_Qualkenbush_Chapa.pdf?ver=2018-07-31-093713-297
[vi] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[vii] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[viii] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[ix] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-woodrow-wilsons-propaganda-machine-changed-american-journalism-180963082/
[x] http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/bernprop.html?xid=PS_smithsonian
[xi] https://archive.ph/BKAqU#selection-257.500-257.559
[xii] https://archive.ph/BKAqU#selection-319.6-319.1337 From Propaganda (1928)
[xiv] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[xv] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[xvi] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[xvii] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[xviii] http://chinese-cultural-revolution.weebly.com/black-categories.html
[xix] https://rumble.com/v2oyk4i-mao-and-cultural-revolution-qiansong-chen-recollection-on-purge-tactics.html
[xx] https://globalvoices.org/2012/08/13/chinas-new-black-five-categories-social-threat-or-core-strength/ (https://archive.ph/4j0cE)
[xxi] https://web.archive.org/web/20200716094913/https:/www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Building_Back_Better_2020.pdf
[xxii] https://weforum.ent.box.com/v/gsc-annual-report-20-21 (From: https://www.globalshapers.org/partnerships)
[xxiii] https://rumble.com/v1dir79-wef-and-un-strategic-partnership-june-2019.html
[i] https://weforum.ent.box.com/v/gsc-annual-report-20-21 (From: https://www.globalshapers.org/partnerships)
[ii] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[iii] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[i] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[ii] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
Amazing how many people still have never heard the name Blackrock or Larry Fink. That's Mordor's true power- convincing others it doesn't exist. Thanks for this piece and for naming names.
Century of the Self is well worth the watch for newbies and seasoned vets of psych warfare alike.
July 4th is the new edition? Will this also be a free download or you can purchase it on Amazon? Is there any chance you can release it as an audiobook?