“The cited statements were not directives. They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19. They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it's prohibited or it's unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin," Isaac Belfer, one of the lawyers, told the court during the Nov. 1 hearing in federal court in Texas.
That is like DNC defending its actions in court saying they are a just a corporation which is free to choose their party candidates by whatever method they desire. By lying, cheating, smoke filled rooms,.., whatever. DNC got away with their explanation, and most likely, so will the FDA.
Lying dogs, of course they forbade doctors
That is like DNC defending its actions in court saying they are a just a corporation which is free to choose their party candidates by whatever method they desire. By lying, cheating, smoke filled rooms,.., whatever. DNC got away with their explanation, and most likely, so will the FDA.