The Appeasing Populace & their GEEPS posing as Leaders

Every day we wake up and make decisions that can irrevocably alter the course of our circle of control or influence. The more responsibility we acquire – rightly or wrongly – the more damage and detriment one is likely to cause from a single course of action. In the course of history, such pivotal moments lead up to years of conflict and war and Holocaustic treks we are told will never happen again, but they always do; as people are much forgetful of the past they never personally knew, and can internally reason away all the choices they will make to bring forth such horrors without even considering their complicity to it all.

One cannot mention the above without a reference to the most documented point in history of this happening: Nazi Germany. From William Shirer’s master work, one has re-read it as current world politicians and billionaires wage their agenda to pit man against man, generation against generation, and hustles and fears against a withering concept called reality and truth.

Shirer wrote [299-300]:

On January 30, 1937, Hitler addressed the Reichstag, proclaiming ‘the withdrawal of the German signature’ from the Versailles Treaty – an empty but typical gesture, since the treaty was by now dead as a doornail – and reviewing with pride the record of his four years in office. He could be pardoned for his pride, for it was an impressive record in both domestic and foreign affairs. He had, as we have seen, abolished unemployment, created a boom in business, built up a powerful Army, Navy, and Air Force, provided them considerable armaments and the promise of more on a massive scale. He had singlehandedly broken the fetters of Versailles and bluffed his way into occupying the Rhineland. Completely isolated at first, he had found a loyal ally in Mussolini and another in Franco, and he had detached Poland from France. Most important of all, perhaps, he had released the dynamic energy of the German people, reawakening their confidence in the nation and their sense of its mission as a great and expanding world power.

Everyone could see the contrast between this thriving, martial, boldly led new Germany and the decadent democracies in the West, whose confusions and vacillations seemed to increase with each new month of the calendar. Though they were alarmed, Britain and France had not lifted a finger to prevent Hitler from violating the peace treaty by rearming Germany and by reoccupying the Rhineland; they had been unable to stop Mussolini in Abyssinia. And now, as the year 1937 began, they were cutting a sorry figure by their futile gestures to prevent Germany and Italy from determining the outcome of the Spanish Civil War…

Neither Great Britain and France, their governments and their peoples, nor the majority of the German people seemed to realize as 1937 began that almost all that Hitler had done in his first four years was a preparation for war. This writer can testify from personal observation that right up to September 1, 1939, the German people were convinced that Hitler would get what he wanted – and what they wanted – without recourse to war. But among the elite who were running Germany, or serving it in the key positions, there could have been no doubt what Hitler’s objective was…Goering, who in September 1936 had been put in charge of the Four-Year Plan, bluntly stated what was coming in a secret speech to industrialists and high officials in Berlin.

The battle we are now approaching [he said] demands a colossal measure of production capacity. No limit on rearmament can be visualized. The only alternatives are victory or destruction…We live in a time when the final battle is in sight. We are already on the threshold of mobilization and we are already at war. All that is lacking is the actual shooting.

In the present day, much can be unpacked that distinctly echoes the above passage. But often, the populace has different prisms or lenses in which they view the above passage versus current realities. Neither of these are 100% accurate – if we polarize them – and that split is most useful for “elites” (as Shirer even noted), in getting people to go along with whatever policy whim or ongoing agenda is placed before them every day. That 2030 Agenda is disseminated into the ether that is called The Internet. For the Globalist Elitist Evil Parasites (GEEPs), they can control messaging – and will continue to escalate their desires to – until their present 5^th generation war on speech, thought, and basic human existence reaches that “final battle” as Goering mentioned.

Certain actors mirror that above passage in brief:

• China has built up a powerful army, navy and air force; congeal a majority of key natural resources into its grasp; reacquired Hong Kong in violation of an agreement made; and seeks its plum in Taiwan, along with other colonies it had in its possession 200 years ago. While not as economically stable as Germany was in 1937 – each were/are a well-crafted facade covering up deep and destructive regimes of jailing, disappearing and killing those who dare question their Regimes. [State Regime Propaganda is in The West. Implemented to become more than China’s equal.]

• The Western Democracies are decadent to a degree that would make Shirer shake his head in utter dismay. Drug-addled (21^st century fentanyl from China mirrors the forced opium trade on China in the 19^th century that saw a host of countries (European, US, Japan) advantage themselves off China’s last dynasty) and degrading rapidly under Maoist and Marxist tactics regarding race, gender and sexuality from schools, board rooms to institutions connected to governments. Moral decay is visible everywhere.

• China and Russia alliance (whether of convenience for the moment, or lasting, due to prior geopolitical actions of the Western Democracies) has acquired embittered and US-threatened allies that have the economic wherewithal to more than challenge the U.S.-led (NATO) alliance. The monetary system hinges on resources. The BRICS+ have them; the West (particularly Europe) lacks them.  

  

• The violation of promises from Western Democracies regarding encroachment on Russia, post-USSR, made for a calculus that Putin & other countries could not overlook. The U.S. arrogance that backstops weak NATO allies – who can’t field any army or do anything substantial without broad support from the U.S. belies all their warmongering rhetoric. Their only legitimate weapon: nuclear threats. Using 5^th generation war – a war without rules – using economic warfare (cutting off SWIFT to Russia) only pushed other Global South countries toward the BRICS+ because US sanctions have routinely found them too. (Biden’s administration ties executive orders regarding “transgender” and “conversion therapy” to money and sanctions on other countries. This coincides with Russia has ACTUALLY benefited on its oil sales through intermediaries LIKE CHINA, increasing revenues by $15 billion.) [Edit]

• This war began, in earnest, around the 2016 US election and Brexit votes. Populism, in the West, strongly triggered the Intel-Agency-Corporate apparatuses worldwide. [The WEF is very much a visible example of all these groups together.] Much of the foundation of this though went back to Bush’s Patriot Act – the war declared on international terrorism. However, the supply of that terrorism was paltry (and required building up terrorist’s capacities and capabilities, real and imagined, to keep the fear in populations alive); so destabilizing countries across the Middle East and Eastern Europe were the immediate game to exploit. Now that those localities have been mined to depletion, domestic targeting of people that detested that international war on terrorism, are now these powerfully-funded (by your tax dollars) immediate targets. Whether over being “MAGA”, a “COVID-deniers” or “Climate deniers” these militant Agencies – using health and stealth – are out to destruct one’s rights through a war without rules. This is an ongoing Ponzi War – the need to feed the Empire’s killing machine with more souls to keep bankers and contracts flush with cash.

• As a result, REGIME MEDIA worldwide has flooded the zone with fear and cult narratives (left and right) to destabilize The West. The GEEPS are creeps with near total control of social media, search algorithms, and data mining people through phones and computers, to build out an AI and Surveillance model that would be the wettest dream of any 1930s totalitarian leader. This was kickstarted in China (in the last decade plus) where this was so easy to implement on a culture, a people, that knows exactly how to obey orders disseminated from the top: the CCP hierarchy.

• One overarching caveat: the populace that listens and still obeys the REGIME MEDIA, or swallows their various gaslights, false appeals to decency “we are all in this together”, engage in the whataboutism game, or thinks their government has something of value to offer them, are the populace that Bonhoeffer warned of. That Yuri Bezmenov warned of (listen below). That any number of rational folks found themselves arguing with during the year that overly twisted into the GEEP’s war (whether that’s 2016, 2020, you pick). But Yuri stated, paraphrasing, “[we] are in a state of war always.”

Many just don’t see the war. In appeasing their minds, their children, their friends, their co-workers, their bosses, and their GEEPs, most vitally, they are tangibly complicit along the trek that allow not just for a Hitler, but for a host of copycats, even since the end of 1945.

The History of Appeasement

With the departure of British PM Stanley Baldwin, Hitler met the next one: Neville Chamberlain. As Shirer mentioned (302): “The Germans were pleased to hear that the new British Prime Minister would take a more active part in foreign affairs than had his predecessor and that he was determined to reach, if possible, an understanding with Nazi Germany.” The nature of that understanding was to Hitler’s Foreign Office:

From England we want colonies and freedom of action in the East…The British need for tranquility is great. It would be profitable to find out what England would be willing to pay for such tranquility.

Germany made various battle scenario preparations (attack and defense plans, both regarding two fronts akin to WWI, differing by strategic concentration (303)), with one tied to an “operation against Czechoslovakia (304).”

Within various conversations and late-night meetings held over many moons, it was a darkening Berlin autumn day on the November 5, 1937 (remember! remember!), that, Shirer noted, “the die was cast (307).” Hitler decided to go to war to creating Lebensraum (space) for the German people. However, the timing was whimsical, spanning from 1938 to 1943-45 (308). Not exactly inspiring confidence for the military planners and men that would later destroy the French Army in a matter of six weeks (May-June 1940) and march to well within a hour’s drive of Moscow.

Quite a few of those planners were soon relieved of their commands via kompromat and not-so-subtle insistence. “Sixteen of them, including Generals von Rundstedt, von Leeb, von Witzleben, von Kluge and von Kliest, were relieved of their commands, and forty-four others, who were regarded as less than enthusiastic in their devotion to Nazism, were transferred (318-319).” Shirer continued, “Hitler’s house cleaning of February 4 was not confined to generals. He also swept Neurath out of the Foreign Office, replacing him with the shallow and compliant Ribbentrop.” Ribbentrop would be known for his dalliances with the divorcee Wallis Simpson that married the King Edward VII of England who stepped down.

Shirer noted that, “February 4, 1938, is a major turning in the history of the Third Reich, a milestone on its road to war. On that date the Nazi revolution, it might be said, was completed. The last of the conservatives who stood in the way of Hitler’s embarking upon the course which he had long determined to follow, once Germany was sufficiently armed, were swept away (320).” Hitler detested the “vaunted” and vain Prussian officers, as Shirer wrote, “accepted with scarcely a murmur the officially condoned murder of Generals von Schleicher and von Bredow. It was swallowing supinely now the cashiering of its senior officers.” As it turns out, military officers are regimented to appeasing the worst dictators and world leaders, with scarcely a peep heard from them.

Echoes of History

On February 4, 2022, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin put out a 12-page memorandum regarding their alliance and objectives titled: “Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development.”[i]

While not much covered, inside lay a vast array of points of agreement and commitments to be carried through – if subtle to a reader. Certain aspects caught one’s eye and attention:

“The sides believe that the advocacy of democracy and human rights must not be used to put pressure on other countries. They oppose the abuse of democratic values and interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states under the pretext of protecting democracy and human rights, and any attempts to incite divisions and confrontation in the world…

The sides note that the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights set noble goals in the area of universal human rights, set forth fundamental principles, which all the States must comply with and observe in deeds. At the same time, as every nation has its own unique national features, history, culture, social system and level of social and economic development, universal nature of human rights should be seen through the prism of the real situation in every particular country, and human rights should be protected in accordance with the specific situation in each country and the needs of its population…

The sides are seeking to advance their work to link the development plans for the Eurasian Economic Union and the Belt and Road Initiative with a view to intensifying practical cooperation between the EAEU and China in various areas and promoting greater interconnectedness between the Asia Pacific and Eurasian regions. The sides reaffirm their focus on building the Greater Eurasian Partnership in parallel and in coordination with the Belt and Road construction to foster the development of regional associations as well as bilateral and multilateral integration processes for the benefit of the peoples on the Eurasian continent…

The Russian side reaffirms its support for the One-China principle, confirms that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, and opposes any forms of independence of Taiwan.

Russia and China stand against attempts by external forces to undermine security and stability in their common adjacent regions, intend to counter interference by outside forces in the internal affairs of sovereign countries under any pretext, oppose colour revolutions, and will increase cooperation in the aforementioned areas…

The sides believe that certain States, military and political alliances and coalitions seek to obtain, directly or indirectly, unilateral military advantages to the detriment of the security of others, including by employing unfair competition practices, intensify geopolitical rivalry, fuel antagonism and confrontation, and seriously undermine the international security order and global strategic stability. The sides oppose further enlargement of NATO and call on the North Atlantic Alliance to abandon its ideologized cold war approaches, to respect the sovereignty…

The sides are seriously concerned about the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom (AUKUS), which provides for deeper cooperation between its members in areas involving strategic stability, in particular their decision to initiate cooperation in the field of nuclear-powered submarines.

Russia and China believe that such actions are contrary to the objectives of security and sustainable development of the Asia Pacific region, increase the danger of an arms race in the region, and pose serious risks of nuclear proliferation…”

One need not be a geopolitical strategist to know Russia and China are a formidable tandem and they can each deal a civilization-ending death blow to the United States and Europe through a myriad of means – not just nuclear war. Cyber, drug, economic resource-restriction (Saudi Arabia) are equally useful, in concert, or step-wise, to make the soft people in the West destruct themselves. Interesting though, these two powers specifically call out nuclear submarines.

That is called a tell. They fear that first-strike capability.

But this is why Neocon-driven antagonism (old Bush people in Biden’s cabinet, UK delusional morons) seems odd given the utter lack of preparedness the U.S. people have for any actuality of a war. Energy policy alone – depleting strategic oil reserves, restrictive energy policies, constraining common folks from vital means to fend for themselves (food, energy, water, housing) seems quite antithetical to preparing for a clear and present danger (caused by U.S. foreign policy blunders) for all Humanity.

Which is why this seems like appeasement by other means? A well-guised way to placate forces that are seeking to destruct the Western world while keeping war embers burning and various fear porn blaring on Regime Media. Is it yet another distraction to keep the Populist worldwide from congealing and committing to removal of their GEEPS from office by any legal (and likely as not) not-so-legal means.

~

The appeasement we do not need is to these GEEPs. These people are serious about destroying everyone’s way of life. Remember, remember – there is no future without the moral courage to act. As we know, Hitler preceded to exploit Chamberlain brilliantly; war came about that is still resonating, by date, and dictates, to this very day.

---

[i] https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/CASI/documents/Translations/2022-02-04%20China%20Russia%20joint%20statement%20International%20Relations%20Entering%20a%20New%20Era.pdf