Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Meddling Kid's avatar

What I see in your design only “works” for two scenarios, and one of those never worked as intended either.

Firstly as the idea of a homeless high rise to get maximum homeless off the streets and into an environment where they have every opportunity to get back on their feet. So it’s highly subsidized and can’t even cover costs, and would never be built with private money, only with (wasted) public money. These always fail for many reasons.

Secondly as a college dorm, and one of the nicer types because they are private rooms with private bathrooms. Depending on the college and the state, there may or not be those annual real estate taxes.

The costs of construction may also be affected by the local union rates in different cities, further dooming the profitability. Overall you’re quantifying the razor thin (or negative) profit factor that explains why minimalist, low-income housing is never built without public subsidies.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts