New Term: Compartmentalized Totalitarianism
Kit Knightly of the Off Guardian provided the concept
First, thanks to Kit Knightly for his thoughts. It got me thinking from his post image and the overall thrust of his article. So I made a simple diagram from his main points in his article.
Kit tells you upfront what is the long and ongoing Agenda:
Global government is the endgame. We know that.
Total control of every aspect of life for every single person on the planet, that’s the goal. [My emphasis.]
Basically too, this is a follow-up to my recent posting(s):
Kit discusses a working concept that is not-so-clear, certainly not to those still thinking things are hunky dory, but works for these hidden forces:
There will never be an overt declaration of a change of system. We will not be told we are united under a new model, instead the illusion of regionality & superficial variance will camouflage a lack of real choice across the political landscape. A thin polysystemic skin stretched tight over a monosystemic skeleton.
Capitalism, communism, socialism, democracy, tyranny, monarchy…these words will steadily dilute in meaning, even more than they have already, but they will never be abandoned.
What globalism will bring us – I suggest – is a collection of nation-states largely in name only, operating superficially different systems of government all built on the same underpinning assumptions and all answering to an unelected and undeclared higher authority. [My emphasis.]
From this passage, I thought about a new term. Kit added the key word that provided 50% of this post titling:
This, I suggest, is how global government will take shape in 2024 and beyond.
Compartmentalized, utterly deniable…but very, very real.
Share around. Maybe this clarifies better what others are talking to, but it doesn’t click for some quite yet.
Or not.
Oh….the United States is now $34 trillion in debt. And we spent more on debt to “create” GDP growth in Q3 2023. (From Zero Hedge). This means you are spending more printed dollars and GDP did not grow 1-to-1. That is INSANE!
Great concept, Jason. Especially devious because it seemingly inverts the pyramid, putting centralized global agencies in service of local economies. But as Kit and you aptly point out, that's "A thin polysystemic skin stretched tight over a monosystemic skeleton." Important visualization.