Hunter Biden: A Spoiled Traitor Crying Foul Through A Frivolous Lawsuit
Hunter Biden, the 50-something so-called lawyer and hack artist, today sued 27-year-old wunderkind Garrett Zeigler because he published the contents of Hunter’s Laptop from Hell online. Through Garrett’s work, the U.S. population learned how deeply depraved the first son of the doddering old and demented 46th President actually is. And as well, how many deals and criminal violations of the law the FIRST SON has profited off of while flying across the globe during the period 2010-2019 as the Biden bagman.
This lawsuit came, as always, right as Joe Biden’s connections to Hunter’s deals finally got a weak Speaker of the House to open an impeachment inquiry. Such an inquiry was obviously needed if one noted how Joe Biden threatened Ukrainian President Poroshenko, the withholding a billion dollars if not done within six hours, to get rid of a prosecutor looking into Burisma located in Ukraine. Burisma is where Hunter was placed on the board; received 83,333 per month for two years; that was later reduced to $50,000 per month after the Vice-President was out of office.
Mere weeks after Joe was out of the VP office, Hunter met with Chairman Ye Jianming of CEFC (an enormous energy conglomerate out of China). They met in Miami to discuss a lucrative deal to provide access to high value industrial assets across the world (and the United States) for the CCP-connected CEO in Ye and his CCP minions that Hunter later came to know.
That conversation matured into direct deposits into Hunter’s coffers by August 2017, totaling well into the millions. (Click on the image to go to the PDF file on CATHAY BANK Report. Or this Suspicious Activity Report from JPMorganChase regarding people close to Hunter and the array of LLCs.)
Hunter laid out his perception of this CEFC deal in an email sent on August 2, 2017:
My Understanding is that the original agreement with the Director was for consulting fees based on introductions alone a rate of $10M per year for a three year guarantee total of $30M. The chairman changed that deal after we me in MIAMI TO A MUCH MORE LASTING AND LUCRATIVE ARRANGEMENT to create a holding company 50% percent owned by ME and 50% owned by him. Consulting fees is one piece of our income stream but the reason this proposal by the chairman was so much more interesting to me and my family is that we would also be partners inn the equity and profits of the JV’s investments. Hence I assumed the reason for our discussion today in which you made clear that the Chaireman would first get his investment capital returned in the profits would then be split 50/50. If you saying that is not the case then please return us to the original deal 10M per year a guaranteed 3 years plus bonus payments for any successful deal we introduce. let's discuss thank you [My emphasis.]
Hunter mentioned “my family.” But this was not the first instance of someone acknowledging Hunter’s network of family relationships who were to benefit. The 10% for the Big Guy email spells out the web pretty clearly. Sent just 3 months prior (May 13th) and tied to the aforementioned deal with the Chinese (as Director Zang worked for Ye).
I am happy to raise any detail with Zang if there is shortfalls ? At the moment there s a provisional agreement that the equity will be distributed as follows
20 H [Hunter Biden]
20 RW [Rob Walker]
20 JG [James Gilliar]
20 TB [Tony Bobulinski]
10 Jim [James Biden]
10 held by H for the big guy ? [Hunter, Joe Biden - the logical conclusion.]
This is slip up by James Gilliar needs to be pursued in a court; or more importantly: in the impeachment “inquiry” while under oath.
The Biden BS Lawsuit
The tenor of a lawsuit is a tell. It shows the state of mind of the filer and the linguistic designs to be either emotionally-based, or factually-based. Here is the opening that is emotional from the outset:
The accusation is that the data is somehow tampered, manipulated or altered. That of course can be easily disproved - because the original copy of this data originally landed with the FBI around November 2019. If the FBI were a legitimately operating organization, based in truth and justice, this frivolous lawsuit would be easily dismissed on that basis alone. Others as well have reviewed the data, in detail, and noted the authenticity of all of it.
Hunter’s lawyers are making broad accusations, without any specificity, generalizing and smearing the defendant(s) based on who Garrett worked with or obtained the information from.
The sad thing is: California, where this was filed, is as notorious as Washington D.C. and New York City. A judge will undoubtedly be a hand-picked ally; and if this gets to a trial, one can rest assured Californians are just as bad as District of Columbians, as the bar to find liability is low.
Maybe a judge will feel otherwise.
Further filings on this case:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67788762/biden-v-ziegler/