Chapter 1: One World Order Agenda
Continued (Sample)
One World Order Agenda (Part I)
[Note: Shirer’s lack of understanding of taxes, and the escape of them by the wealthiest, who could actually pay them, should be observed. The ability to raise taxes and cut spending at the same time is not even in the basket of delusional abilities of 21st century technocrats in D.C.
Though these administrators, from Congress to Treasury, routinely hustle the public on their technological expertise and abilities to do such things together. But, as of the last twenty years, the idea of balancing budgets, as will be shown by U.S. national debt (much further below), does not even enter the worldview of modern technocrats with their Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). Some contend, rightly, there is no error, rather: the intention is to break the U.S. monetary system – and destroy the United States dollar as the world currency of settlement.[i]]
To put meat on the bones of Shirer’s contentions, renowned author in his own right, Antony Sutton, wrote voluminously in his lifetime about the Soviets and the Nazis and the financial manipulations coming from Wall Street to Washington to London. In the work, Wall Street and FDR (1975), Chapter 3, Sutton provided the names, plots and organizations that drove the Weimar Republic towards the brutal genocidal hands of a WWI corporal with a hatred of capitalism, and the kleptocrats, alike.
Sutton discussed (31-41) the 1918-23 Weimar crisis and the financial benefactors of this regime problem:
“Reparations have an effect on the balance of payments similar to imports. They require either taxation or deficit spending to offset the drain. If the course of deficit spending is followed, the result will be inflationary, and this was the course followed in Germany.
Germany was obligated by the Allies to make recompense for all damage to private property, except in Russia and to pay all costs of Allied troops on German soil, but no maximum limit was set on the demands. Germany had forthwith to surrender 100 billion gold marks, with payments of one billion gold marks annually after 1921. The final payments plan worked out at the ‘London Ultimatum’ in May 1921 reflected these harsh and impossible terms and so provided a clear incentive to inflate to remove the burden of direct payments…
The so-called experts…Owen D. Young of the General Electric Company. J.P. Morgan, with Thomas N. Perkins and Thomas Lamont as alternates.
Worthy of note that businessman on the German side…were…in November 1918 a group of the Reich's most prominent businessmen, comprising Stinnes, Albert Voegler (then director of the Gelsenkirchen Mining Co., Ltd.), Carl Friedrich von Siemens, Felix Deutsche (of German General Electric), Director Mankiewitz of the Deutsche Bank, and Director Salomonsohn, of the Diskontogesellschaft, financed the movement of a Hitler forerunner…
The pertinent point is that the Felix Deutsche mentioned was a director of German General Electric and the American reparations representatives included Owen D. Young of General Electric [as well].
The policies that led to the ruinous German inflation were initiated under Chancellor Wilhelm Cuno, who was, immediately prior to becoming Chancellor, the president of Hamburg-America Line (HAPAG). Two of Cuno's co directors at HAPAG were Max Warburg, Hamburg banker and brother of Paul Warburg, member of the Federal Reserve System Advisory Board in the United States, and John von Berenberg Gossler, a member of the German advisory board of Franklin D. Roosevelt's United European Investors, Ltd.[UEI]
Cuno was dismissed as German Chancellor in August 1923…Cuno came from a business circle that was able and willing to take pecuniary and personal advantage of the German inflation.
…the ultimate collapse of the German mark in 1923 ruined the German middle class and benefited three groups: a few German big businessmen, a few foreign businessmen who were in a position to gain advantage from the inflation, and the rising Hitler movement. As president of United European Investors, Ltd., Franklin D. Roosevelt was among those foreign businessmen who took advantage of Germany's misery for their own gain.
In…Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, we identified personal links between Wall Street financiers and Bolshevik revolutionaries…The precisely established links previously implicated the then German Ambassador to the United States, Count von Bernstorff, and his friend Adolph von Pavenstedt, senior partner in Amsinck & Co., who was ‘for many years a chief paymaster of the German spy system in this country.’ Amsinck & Co. was controlled by the J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, and other New York financial interests through American International Corporation.
[Moreover] Adolph von Pavenstedt and Edmund Pavenstedt…were also members of another financial house, Müller, Schall & Company. And it is at Müller, Schall that in 1922 we find Franklin D. Roosevelt at his [UEI] United European Investors, Ltd.
[Notable: Pavenstedts likely competed with the Roosevelts in Puerto Rican sugar properties, as Sutton keenly surmises, based on both families interest held in Caribbean sugar companies.]”[ii] [My emphasis added.]
Sutton reflected on UEI’s stock ownership details, correspondence, maneuvers, and later, the cash out of FDR in May 1926. There were early investigations on the shady dealings of UEI, particularly its involvement with the “Roberts-Gould element (39)”[iii]; and FDR was made aware of this by July 29, 1922 through his key advisor then: Louis Howe. Correspondences by Gould to FDR pointed out that the “jealous bankers whose scheme we hurt, and whose plans were upset. Had we not issued today we would have failed (40).”[iv] To be fair, as Sutton is, FDR was just a name attached to draw in investors to the scheme; not a “master mind (41)” as Gould described FDR to butter up his more prestigious cohort. Both advantaged themselves off Germany’s inflationary misery through Cuno’s timely position as Chancellor, Cuno’s board seat at HAPAG coinciding with Gossler’s relationship to FDR’s UEI’s German operation.
~
In this historic review, one remembers the Spanish Flu of 1918 which took more lives than all of World War I.[v],[vi] But the series of catastrophic events built the cauldron of chaos – Europe’s World War, 1918 Virus, Versailles Reparations, Weimar Inflation Spiral, German Social Unrest, USSR’s policies resulting in the Ukrainian Holodomor, Nazi and Communist Extremism, Failed Coup(s), Conflicting Ideologies, the Rise of Dictatorships Globally – that keeps the common population in a state of flux, instability, stress, and thirsty for any answers sans that of a war.
War is the unfortunate and devilish ploy of those malevolent enough, and financially backed to achieve its ends at the highest social price; and persuasive enough, to get a population to accept them as the only path left to them while under the extremist spell of Mass Formation. Bombarding a population with propaganda and disinformation – to define an enemy – while conveniently shifting all the State’s sins on to this defined enemy is done in the present day. (The United States government (and particularly, its Agencies), sadly have done this for decades through media outlets and supported NGOs, such as the National Endowment for Democracy, a CIA front-facing organization.[vii])
~
History echoes well in many respects here. Similar events, but not the inevitable sequencing, or the crass Hitlerian word choices are clear enough. Heir apparent Klaus Schwab also “wrote” two books. COVID 19: The Great Reset and The Great Narrative exploited the crisis position to create the Davos Man opportunity that he and his acolytes parroted well since March 2020. This in concert with Xi Jinping’s avid promotion of the CCP lockdown desires made the former book quite a social engineering tell, released just three months after the pandemic began in the West and timed well with George Floyd’s death. These tombs spelled out disaster for Western values, particularly for the small business and non-technology, entrepreneurial classes.
Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret wrote in The Great Narrative:
“The pandemic was one such thing. Many international organizations and individuals had warned for years that a pandemic would occur but, despite this, it took most of the world by complete surprise. Now (December 2021), almost two years since it began, the pandemic seems never-ending and continues to drag on. We hope that the COVID-19 crisis will soon be over, but will it...Pandemics as a social and psychological phenomenon are not episodic: they linger for years. A historian of science and medicine puts it this way: ‘We are living in the COVID-19 era, not the COVID-19 crisis. There will be lots of changes that are substantial and persistent…We will be dealing with many of the ramifications of COVID-19 for decades.’ ”[viii] [My emphasis added.]
Notice in this brief passage, the ability to reinforce the crisis, uncertainty, longevity, and emotional stress with tension-filled words. The repeating of pandemic or COVID-19 is not by accident. The historian cited references back to a New York Times article (by Gina Kolata) who quoted Allan Brandt, a Harvard University professor. The word choice: drag, linger, never-ending, warned, persistent, decades, give the impression of no hope can be had regarding this manufactured catastrophe.
And that is the emotional and psychological operations point.
Pandemics do not drag on for decades. The individual repercussions from those that died, no doubt, have such personal impacts, but wane considerably with time as with any grieving process. The small businesses shuttered (by design) are of course a uniquely felt problem as well here. But several pandemics have occurred since 1918, and those were orders of magnitude more deadly (deaths/world population at their outset); and handled far better by those populations, despite less technology, medicines, and preparedness. In other words: in spite of all our technological advancement, we allowed ourselves to be manipulated and maneuvered over a virus that was “engineered,” both cellularly and psychologically, for even greater impact on Humanity.
Jeffrey Tucker, a libertarian at the Brownstone Institute[ix], noted the 1968-69 H3H2 “Hong Kong Flu” caused none of the overblown responses. “That generation approached viruses with calm, rationality and intelligence. We left disease mitigation to medical professionals, individuals and families, rather than politics, politicians and government.”[x]
But this pandemic was not about truth or the real intentions of Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset narrative. Schwab continued on into the next paragraph:
“Lessons from past pandemics…Among them are the acceleration of automation and innovation, rising inequalities, the growing power of tech and surveillance, the rising rivalry between the United States and China, the partial retreat from globalization, the economic paradigm shift, and an increasingly fractious geopolitical landscape.”[xi]
Notice only one of the above is neutral linguistically (innovation), while the remaining list is conflict-addled for emotional impacts to the reader.
~
Klaus and colleagues deployed such high-level concepts, regarding massive changes, corporate-government cooperation while also destabilizing disliked populations (most humans) – those who are natives to a country and complained too much about Globalization’s ills, half-birthed in the 1970s by his mentor, Kissinger.[xii] Klaus’s schtick bares some semblance to early 20th century corporate-socialists, namely, the writings of Brookings and Filene.[xiii]
Change is not uniquely desired by all populations; and often it is the youngest (and most inexperienced) that are molded to think immediate change is needed by the intellectuals that have deeper agendas regarding maintaining or acquiring power. Many, typically older persons, in non-academic situations, are rather contented to slow progressions, and for good reasons. Their understanding acquired from parent’s stories, readings or impactful experiences on what happened in Germany from the Spring of 1918 to the Fall of 1923 (or later, the Eastern Bloc under the Soviets) play a fundament part in that slow to change. That the Five-Year Weimar Unplan ushered in extremism across the Globe that undoubtedly fueled World War II is now worthy of review, yet again.
The wisdom of older adults knows something now is amiss. Even if they don’t always have the scientific or academic backgrounds to decipher the thrust behind it, they inherently feel the social, political and economic echoes of ginning up extremism rather well. Time in the world milieu provided a coarser education on the twists and turns of history. But it is education, nonetheless, and it is to be valued dearly.
Sutton in Wall Street and FDR foreshadowed the old-becomes-new hustle of corporations with their bureaucratic technocrats together: “the principles of corporate socialism are but a thin veneer for the acquisition of wealth by a few at the expense of the many (70).”[xiv] To understand how such men behind the curtain are made, one need only review the biographic sketch of Edward Filene provided by Sutton.
Filene, “served as chairman of the Metropolitan Planning Commission of Boston, promoter of people's banks, and provided assistance to various cooperative movements. Filene was active in the Red Cross and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce; a founder of the League to Enforce Peace; a founder and later president of the Cooperative League, subsequently renamed the Twentieth Century Fund; and a member of the Foreign Policy Association and the Council on Foreign Relations (70).”[xv]
Filene was an FDR acolyte, campaigner (prior to his death in 1937 at 77), and a writer of two notable books: The Way Out (1924) and Successful Living in this Machine Age (1932). Filene wrote (as Sutton cited), “the finest possible public service of businessmen is that rendered in and through the private businesses of the world (71).”[xvi] [My emphasis.]
Sutton nods to Kissinger – “the road to peace is the balance of power” argument— was a Fileneian adoption of a “19th-century formula (71)” that Sutton noted, even if Filene did not, leads to great chaos and world war.
This current iteration of the Globalist Parasitic plan is a technocratic, class-based, top-down desire to change the geopolitical and financial chess board for specific and special benefits to an elitist group, yet again. One of Klaus’s key acolytes, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, noted this in 2020: “This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset.”[xvii]
The linguistic tells above echoed those of a more refined 21st century Hitler, as the political originations are now to the Left. (This too exploits the Left-Right political paradigm for divide-and-rule of populations across a host of decision vectors in people’s lives. Health decisions and racial appearances being the most operative since 2020 started. Much akin to the Nazis usage of those vectors in the 1930s, regarding health and hygiene laws and the Jewish, non-Aryan people as their target.
Identity politics firmly reestablished in America under Obama – and that was by design, a top-down sabotage of burgeoning political movements (Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street). Race, gender, sexuality, and handicaps are pushed from WEF-attached corporations like Anheuser-Busch InBev.[xviii],[xix] Much like Mao, the ever-altering American vicissitudes of intersectionality, a victim points and virtue-signaling hierarchy of slivered out chaos has commoditized people into brands for sale; customers to carve up in hospitals before they leave their middle school years; and pandering, wine moms that do little thinking while their husbands or “sperm donors” are left either to submit to their Munchausen’s by proxy behaviors, or be fined, jailed, or censored for calling their once, easily identifiable offspring by their birth names, instead of whatever gets them the most clicks on TikTok, the Chinese app. Transgenderism and racism are the information agents daily push – especially with Biden’s executive orders tying funding to compliance with U.S policy regarding “conversion therapy” for other countries.[xx] This while conversion of boys and girls, who can’t be sure what they want, is promoted by the AMA and the APA as “gender-affirming care”[xxi], the same professional medical class that did so well in regards COVID-19 death impacts. [This is one’s analysis and opinion.]
Sutton ended his Genesis of Corporate Socialism chapter with an appropriate summary of what is the 2020s plight towards Agenda 2030. BlackRock’s Larry Fink has advocated for this idea since Wall Street’s craven antics (dissected in the movie, Inside Job (2010)) destroyed the housing market by 2007-8, but received a FED bailout thereafter:
“What was the philosophy of the financiers so far described? Certainly anything but laissez-faire competition, which was the last system they envisaged. Socialism, communism, fascism or their variants were acceptable. The ideal for these financiers was ‘cooperation,’ forced if necessary. Individualism was out, and competition was immoral. On the other hand, cooperation was consistently advocated as moral and worthy, and nowhere is compulsion rejected as immoral. Why? Because, when the verbiage is stripped away from the high-sounding phrases, compulsory cooperation was their golden road to a legal monopoly. Under the guise of public service, social objectives, and assorted do-goodism it is fundamentally ‘Let society go to work for Wall Street (72).’”[xxii] [My emphasis.]
Again, this 100% corporate-government control path is but a merger of a host of ideological underpinnings: Fascism, Communism, Technocracy, and even, Atheism. Tellingly, Klaus eagerly promoted a 4th Industrial Revolution in a 2015 Foreign Affairs publication. In that article, Klaus buried the idea of Transhumanism subtly at the end:
“We need to shape a future that works for all of us by putting people first and empowering them. In its most pessimistic, dehumanized form, the Fourth Industrial Revolution may indeed have the potential to “robotize” humanity and thus to deprive us of our heart and soul. But as a complement to the best parts of human nature—creativity, empathy, stewardship—it can also lift humanity into a new collective and moral consciousness based on a shared sense of destiny. It is incumbent on us all to make sure the latter prevails.”[xxiii]
Echoes again of The Borg mentality and of 19th century philosophy.
~
Hitler’s ideas, such as these were, came out of a cauldron of philosophic, paganistic, and racist stews brewing up to a formative boil by the cusp of the 20th century. Shirer’s masterwork delved deeply into the men that directly, (or more likely), indirectly shaped the destructive mind and musings of Hitler.
Over the course of the 1800s, the names that fueled the ethnic fires of what became World War I and II ideological-driven tenets, ran back to Hegel, Treitschke, Marx, Nietzsche, and through Richard Wagner and to an Englishman: Houston Steward Chamberlain. Hegel, of the dialectic, is undoubtedly the most visibly enduring into the present day (particularly in the world’s educational systems) with the Thesis, Antithesis, and Synthesis control framework. But in the hands of the global parasitic (GP) elite, the dialectic formulates as: create the problem, exploit the reaction, and offer the solution. Rinse and repeat until the long-sought agendas are accomplished through constant ideological struggle. Shirer reflected cleanly this came out of Hegel’s adoration of State Power:
“To Hegel the State is all, or almost all. Among other things, he says, it is the highest revelation of the ‘world spirit’; it is the ‘moral universe’; it is ‘the actuality of the ethical idea…ethical mind…knowing and thinking itself’; the State ‘has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State…for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges (98).”[xxiv]
Hegel’s role in Marxism is not to be diminished here. Shirer minimized Marx throughout this Reichian reflection (appearing just twice in 1,273 pages), possibly due to Marx’s endpoint: a “no State” outcome. Nevertheless, Shirer linked the “inspiration” of Hitler and Marx together as being drawn from Hegelian philosophies (98).[xxv]
In Marxism, the “anarchic” no-State desires are nearly implausible when applied to Modernity.[xxvi] Even the “best” examples of communism (the final action desired by Marx, the removal of the State) prematurely finishes with a one-party authoritarian rulership firmly in place. For such ideologs with political power, the ultimate expression of Marxism is not as appealing once the enormously risky and deathly domination of a submitted people has been pursued, so obsessively, to an assured, slavish end. Their final task is not sanely possible – because enemies arise that will gladly ensure that death befalls the leader that steps aside even in the slightest. By then, as well, the psychological and physiological pressures (required struggles) may well drive one towards a (Godless) madness.
Humanity as such is flawed, and will continue to be, even as its better organizing principles – a healthy tension of individual liberties and rights versus an agreed upon social contract under a modest Nation-State – has, and can be, achieved successfully for nearly all of its peoples. However, such requires a stern diligence, and vigilance, that most populations grow carelessly complacent about and ignore inevitable circumstances of corruption, criminality and perversion in the State that will result in the present times we see unfolding, exponentially.
~
One offers here that a political psychopathy is a key to this repetitive problem, that of: high intellect, motivation and malevolence, in amply supply, and fueled up by wealth and positioning to easily pervert lesser political sociopaths, personality-disordered, or even “normal” people.[xxvii]
About 1-4% of the human population has these characteristics[xxviii] that drive societies into the dustbin, as Hitler and his lesser minions were overwhelming so disordered. Thereafter, the evolutionary game resets; and it takes about 3-4 generations to spin the wheel of war up again through these humans without a conscience.
A new set of psychopaths – who are not actually ideologically pure, but parasitic in behaviors and use any manipulation to acquire success, or relief from boredom, garner enough political or positional power over a large enough percentage of humanity to create the appropriate backdrop for enormous social destabilization, leading to large-scale wars.
Sadly, financial markets and run-of-the-mill opportunists fuel these megalomaniacs-in-the-making towards such wars and mass death. It is not capitalism – here to blame – it is rampant cronyism, corruption, cartel or monopolistic behaviors towards socialism, large intrusions by government (elitist-level forces), that must “please the mob” and keep their lies pathologically spinning to keep their ruling places at the top. Thus, divide-n-rule, invisible enemies, blame shifting to lower classes, to a support this much larger point: psychopathic-level behaviors grow from disastrous mismanagement and routine and ignored criminal activities.
Sample End…
[ii] Sutton, Antony. Wall Street and FDR. 177 pages. 1975.
[iii] Sutton, Antony. Wall Street and FDR. 177 pages. 1975.
[iv] Sutton, Antony. Wall Street and FDR. 177 pages. 1975.
[v] https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/187/12/2561/5092383?login=false
[vi] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1208625/first-world-war-fatalities-per-country/
[vii] https://rumble.com/v2or48g-system-update-85.html
[viii] Malleret, T and Schwab, Klaus. The Great Narrative. World Economic Forum, 2022. (https://www.amazon.com/Great-Narrative-Reset/dp/2940631301)
[ix] https://brownstone.org/author/jeffrey-tucker/
[x] http://archive.is/cr9cJ New York Post: Why American life went on as normal during the killer pandemic of 1969
[xi] Malleret, T and Schwab, Klaus. The Great Narrative. World Economic Forum, 2022.
[xii] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carter’s foreign policy expert, brought the Globalization deal to a close. As mainland, CCP-led, China was given preferred status over Taiwan.
[xiii] Sutton, Antony. Wall Street and FDR. 177 pages. 1975.
[xiv] Sutton, Antony. Wall Street and FDR. 177 pages. 1975.
[xv] Sutton, Antony. Wall Street and FDR. 177 pages. 1975.
[xvi] Sutton, Antony. Wall Street and FDR. 177 pages. 1975.
Trudeau tells UN conference that pandemic provided "opportunity for a reset"
[xviii] https://archive.ph/glEQu
[xix] https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2023-04-17/why-anheuser-busch-went-woke
[xx] https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-13391/p-13
[xxi] https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/population-care/what-know-about-gender-affirming-care-younger-patients
[xxii] Sutton, Antony. Wall Street and FDR. 177 pages. 1975.
[xxiii] https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
[xxiv] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[xxv] Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. 1245 pages, 1960.
[xxvi] The nuance here is not about chaos but rather the ultimate freedom to do as one like, always. This will result, as humanity has repeatedly proven, in mass homicidal actions and such thefts and depravity that will regress humanity thousands of years.
[xxviii] http://www.hare.org/references/NeumannandHareJCCP2008.pdf
Great "sample"!